Conversation
Edited 18 days ago
meta adjacent
Show content

i think theres a major difference between ppl being mdni for posting nsfw n shit and ppl being mdni just cuz they hate minors . i ain’t saying the latter doesnt exist or is ok - that stuff is hella weird - but ppl can and should set that boundary if what theyre posting needs it , for the safety of both parties and i think the vast majority of mdni accounts r like that . be mad at ppl being weird and exclusive because they think all teenagers r immature , not abt the people setting reasonable boundaries . they arent saying theyre “better” than minors , they’re setting boundaries

this aint abt the tf.s situation - idk what happened there - this is just my opinion on the general mdni discourse goin on rn

2
3
17

🎃 lily 🏳️‍⚧️ flag_pansexual flag_ace θΔ ⋐ & ∞

re: meta adjacent
Show content

@ellie@yearning.gay this is a strawman in that what you're saying is completely agreeable but the problem is the discourse you're talking about doesn't exist. no one is complaining about minors dni when the account only ever posts nsfw. the issue comes with the thing in your post which you said you agree with which is when people exclude minors for very weird reasons

1
0
2
re: meta adjacent
Show content

@tauon i have seen several ppl make this argument before and i wanted 2 add my two cents … like i said this isnt related to the current meta situation this is just a general thought ive had for a while

0
0
1
meta adjacent
Show content

@ellie im not caught up on fedi meta , whats gong on ?

0
0
0