Conversation

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

i feel like tf.s is doing the same thing as those trans people who don't post nsfw who have minors dni: you're reinforcing that trans people are a nsfw topic, which is wrong and we need to dismantle it

2
2
3
@tauon i am not one to dickride tf.s. i've given them so much shit. but i do believe this is a way to protect against uh. getting sued for breaking child data protection laws. which would shut down the whole instance. and if a wider transphobic community saw a large instance with minors uh, existing, they would drag up any possible argument or evidence to shut it down. i do think this this is a good move. and they do not mention nsfw content in the announcement. it is about compliance with the law and protection from being sued, which, while it should not cause this, it does, and it is a legal and social liability. i do this this move does actually protect transfems.

and to the other point, do you not understand how easily transfems get called pedophiles for even being near a minor? because 2 weeks after i turned 18 it happened to me. transphobes dredge up any possible "evidence" they can to call us pedophiles. i understand not wanting to even get close to the possibility of that. i know it just comes from not being as experienced on the internet, but "mdni prejudice" is not a real thing. it's about protecting both parties from harassment.
2
0
6

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

@eris@akkoma.meows.gay how do i delete this reply

2
0
0
@tauon like, there is a large degree of autonomy taken from minors, who are seen as property in the eyes of the law. i am 18. less than a year ago i was in the same place. my parents had complete control over me. i understand. but some of this shit is so excessive. trans people with "mdni" to protect themselves online are not personally prosecuting you. its bullshit.
0
0
5
@tauon totally normal response to someone disagreeing with you
0
0
5

@tauon @eris look girl it is Ok to disagree with someone thats like Fine . just agreeing to disagree is way more productive n mature than being snide 4 no reason

1
0
6

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

@ellie@yearning.gay please stop defending it, this isn't funny

1
0
0

@tauon@possum.city what

that's literally not why tf.s is closing to minors though

1
0
1

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

@privateger@plasmatrap.com never said it was did i

0
0
0

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

@ellie@yearning.gay like i get you want to have kinda quirky replies to people but if i'm getting seriously annoyed at someone repeatedly reply guying me to the point i have to block them it isn't appropriate

1
0
0

alinaπŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈπŸΎ

Edited 18 days ago
meta, trying to be helpful but could be misinterpreted, ignore then
Show content

@tauon @ellie can't you just block it? i think the problem could be that you did not consent to an argument, whereas it saw itself to be allowed to criticize your proposal because you were shouting your post into the public

maybe turn it around and imagine what it's like for others who don't consent to you spreading in their eyes false opinions in the public and feel the need to intervene and correct that

that may also be the reason why people blocked you

1
0
1

πŸŽƒ lily πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ flag_pansexual flag_ace ΞΈΞ” ⋐ & ∞

@alina

can’t you just block it?
i did
the problem could be that you did not consent to an argument
correct. this is why i call it a reply creature
maybe turn it around
nope! no thank you! appreciate the reply though
that may also be the reason why people blocked you
good riddance then, i don’t want to ever interact with people like that

0
0
0